LestersLegends.com » fantasy baseball draft strategy


Written by Eric Stashin the Rotoprofessor

Looking for a possible power option late in your draft?  I’m sure that’s a situation many of us are going to find ourselves in.  I know from experience, sitting there at the tail end of my draft just trying to find a name who can provide some power after I didn’t quite get enough in the early rounds.  Well, here are 5 names that are likely to be had after the 18th round who have the potential to significantly help your team in power:

Travis Hafner – Cleveland Indians
He is just 2 seasons removed from a 42 HR campaign, and I find it extremely hard to believe that at 31-years old (he turns 32 in June), he has just completely lost that type of potential.  Problems with his shoulder led to his demise last season, limiting him to 198 AB with 5 HR and hitting .197.  This is a player with a career .284 average and was between 24-42 HR the previous four seasons.

We aren’t talking about a guy who’s going to hit .310 with 40 HR, 110 RBI and 100 R, like he once was.  Would you complain with a late round pick who goes .275 with 28 HR, 85 RBI and 85 R though?

If he’s healthy, there’s no reason to believe that he can’t be that type of player.  No one would project him out to that level, but the upside is there.  There’s that disclaimer to consider, which is why he should be nothing more then a late round flyer in all formats.  That way, if he fails, he doesn’t hurt your team in the least, but if he rebounds it is huge dividends for all.

Billy Butler – Kansas City Royals
I know, given his numbers last season you have to wonder why you would even consider taking him.  We’re talking about a player who had just 11 HR last season and was so bad that he was demoted in June.  Still, 9 HR and a .305 average after the All-Star Break gives plenty of reason for optimism.  He’ll be 23 in April, which tells me that there is plenty of reason to believe the power is still developing.

At Single A in ‘05 he showed the potential, hitting 25 HR in 379 AB.  Even in Triple A in ‘07 (prior to being recalled), he hit 13 HR in 203 AB.  The power is there, he just needs to start hitting the ball in the air more.  In the major leagues, his career FB% is just 33.8%.  As he matures, I fully believe the power is going to come around, with 2009 likely to be the first time owners see his full potential.

I’m not saying he’s going to hit 30+ HR this season, that’s just too big a jump to predict.  I would think 20-25 as very realistic, however, making him a great pick at the end of your draft.

Matt Joyce – Tampa Bay Rays
After hitting 12 HR in 242 AB last season for the Tigers, there are people who are expecting him to fully breakout with regular playing time likely coming with the Rays.  At 24-years old (he’ll turn 25 in August), maybe that’ll be the case but I can’t say that I’m sold on it fully.  That’s not to say that I don’t think he has a chance to hit between 20-25 HR, because I do, but raising your expectations any higher then that would be a mistake.

At Double A in 2007, he had 465 AB and hit 17 HR.  Last season, his success came courtesy of a FB% of 47.5% and a HR/FB of 14.1%.  While I could believe him keeping up that type of HR/FB, a regression in the FB% is likely.  If he had enough AB’s to qualify, it would have placed him ninth in the league and that just isn’t going to happen over a full season.

Is he a good late round pick if you are in need of a bit of power from your OF?  Absolutely, but temper your expectations.  I would put his upside at around 25, not beyond that.

Jack Cust – Oakland Athletics
We all know the story of Jack Cust, don’t we?  He brings with him a tremendous amount of HR ability, but with it comes literally no batting average.  If you are looking for power and nothing else, however, who cares?

I know the HR/FB rate seems very unrealistic at 29.7%, but that was actually a decrease from his ‘07 season (31.7%).  Someone puts up a stat once, we call it an aberration but if he repeats it, we call it a trend.

I have to believe that he is what he’s shown us over the past 2 seasons, so 30 HR is a number that we can almost expect from him.  If you need average, I’d avoid him, otherwise he’s a good source of power at the end of your draft.

Adam LaRoche – Pittsburgh Pirates
Another player whose story is pretty well known; terrible in the first half, tremendous in the second.  Over the past 3 season, let’s take a look at his second half lines:

  • 2006: .323, 19 HR, 48 RBI
  • 2007: .312, 8 HR, 37 RBI
  • 2008: .304, 14 HR, 42 RBI

Could this be the season where he finally puts things together for a full season?  It’s possible, and I would be willing to bet on it with one of my last picks in a draft.  I would be even more apt to do so if I’m making the pick of him as a reserve and I have a bench deep enough to stash him away and wait and see what happens.  Either way, he’s proven to be a player well worth using once the All-Star Game has come and gone, but if he could put it all together a 30 HR campaign is certainly in reach.

So, there are 5 good late game power options for you to consider.  Which one would you most like to own?  Is there someone I didn’t list you’re targeting?

Picture courtesy of Icon Sports Media, Inc.

2009 Fantasy Baseball Top 5 Draft Rules
written by: Delon Ferdinand

Spring training is under way, it’s time to roll up your sleeves and get down to the nitty gritty. Fantasy Baseball is upon us, which means you need help trying to decide a whole bunch of things. What round should I draft a pitcher? Should I spend high for a closer? Is Matt Holliday still a top 20 talent? All of these are great questions, but before you jump into the pool you need to know how to swim. So I’m here to offer you the top 5 fantasy draft rules for Baseball. For the sake of this article, we’re basing this on a standard Roto league with 5X5 scoring and 12 fantasy teams. We’ll dive into head to head and keepers on a later date. We also take our research based on the 2009 rankings from ESPN, Yahoo, CBS, Fox Sports and Sporting News.

1.  Stay far, far away from starting pitching in your first five rounds
Take it from me; I’ve been burned by this far too many times in my eleven-year history of fantasy baseball. However, starting pitching before round 5 creates headaches like you wouldn’t imagine. This includes 2009’s top studs like CC Sabathia, Johan Santana, Tim Lincecum and anyone else you might put up there. Stay away from these players if you want to build a successful fantasy team. It’s not that these guys aren’t good. Quite the opposite, but what you spend to get them is not worth it. Let’s look at the facts:

Let’s take a look at Johan Santana’s numbers against Ervin Santana’s. Based on all of the major rankings, Johan is being drafted in the first round, as early as pick seven and as late as pick ten. Ervin Santana is being drafted on avg. as high as the sixth round and as low as the seventh. Here are both of their numbers for last season:

Johan – 34 games, 16-7 record with a 2.62 ERA, 206 Ks and a 1.15 WHIP

Ervin – 32 games, 16-7 record, 3.49 ERA, 214 Ks, 1.12 WHIP

Stellar numbers for both of these guys, that’s for sure. Now let’s look at Johan’s last five years vs. Ervin’s last three years (he’s only been in the league for four seasons):

Johan – 33.6 games started, 17.2 wins and 7.8 losses, 2.82ERA, 237.8Ks and a 1.02WHIP

Ervin – 31 games started, 13 wins and 9.6 losses, 4.51ERA, 160Ks, 1.30WHIP

There is no question Johan is the better pitcher, that much is obvious. However, we’re talking about Johan giving you 2.6 more starts, 4.2 more wins with 2.2 more losses, 1.69 lower ERA, 77.8 more Ks and a 0.28 lower WHIP based on their averages. If you base it on their performance last season, Johan starts 2 more games, gives you an identical record, 0.82 lower ERA, 8 less Ks and a 0.03 higher WHIP. This is a difference between a Porsche and a Camry. Both get you from point A to point B. You can even listen to the radio the same way, but one will cost you 70K while the other will run you about 30K with fancy options. You have countless cases like this throughout the entire draft but you want to avoid the urge of taking a big name pitcher in the first five rounds. I’ll take big Teixeira in the 10 spot if he’s there over Johan and that brings us to our next point.

2.  Hitting, hitting and more hitting
Are you starting to get the theme of the article? I’m not against pitching; I just think there’s a certain place you take them. I cannot begin to stress how important it is to take an every day player vs. one who plays every five days. I believe most people know that already. The key is not to panic when you see other GM’s taking pitchers off the board. We’ve all been a part of the “pitcher run” on draft day when one GM sets it off by taking Johan, the next one takes Lincecum, then Sabathia goes and all of a sudden eight straight pitchers have been selected. You start thinking to yourself “I got to get a SP too, now is the time”. This would be the single biggest mistake you can make. Let the other GM’s take, you need to stick to the script. If someone wants to take Brandon Webb over Manny Ramirez, you need to be very glad they did. Don’t worry about which GM’s are getting who, you’ll get your starters and here’s why:

In baseball there are 30 teams. Each team starts 5 pitchers. That’s over 150 starting pitchers. Now for arguments sake, let’s say that only the first 3 starters for each team are the only ones worth starting on a fantasy team. That’s still 90 starting pitchers in the draft. In a 12-team league that means no matter when you start taking pitchers, every team in the league can have 7.5 really good starting pitchers. That’s more than enough to go around. Look at the Yankees first 3 starters, Sabathia, Burnett, and Wang. Looks good to me. Take Boston’s rotation of Dice-K, Beckett and Lester. All three will be drafted at some point. A small market team like the Royals brings Meche, Greinke and Bannister to the table. That’s not ideal but I’m willing to bet that all three find their way on someone’s fantasy team this season. Here’s a quick test:

34 games, 14-11 record, 3.98ERA, 183Ks, 1.32WHIP

25 games, 10-8record, 4.18ERA, 122ks, 1.35WHIP

One is Gil Meche and the other is John Maine. I’m sure a lot of you think the first is John Maine upon first glance. He was on the Mets, more wins, NL park, yadda, yadda, yadda. But the first one is Gil Meche. What’s the over/ under on Meche being drafted ahead of Maine this year? Point is, you’ll get your pitching. Don’t panic and get into draft day “runs” because everyone else is doing it.

3.  PUNT a category
No matter how hard you try, you will not get 10s in every category. It’s hard enough to get 7s and 8s all year. If Baseball were a one-month season then you would have no problems. Since it’s a six-month season, the odds of you maintaining a 10 you have in HRS after the first two months are low at best. You can’t draft everyone. You can’t be heavy on the hitting and expect to dominate the pitching numbers. That would take finding an abundant amount of gems in the later round, along with waiver wire gold during the season. Everyone has a category they will do badly in. So why not go into the draft punting a category to strengthen the others. The two categories to punt are SB and SAVES. You punt HR, then you can say goodbye to RBIs too since they go hand in hand. If you punt ERA, say goodbye to having a good WHIP. Stolen bases and saves stand on their own. So you can lose either category and you’re only losing in one area. However, it is not a good idea at all to punt SB. Here’s why:

Stolen bases are like fantasy gold. You hold on to it when you have it. Then when you need to make a deal, there’s always someone who needs it badly. It’s incredibly valuable and you only get it during the draft. Try finding a 40-50 SB guy on your wire. That’s not happening, because even if that guy is there, you got 11 other GMs licking their chops at him. Plus, chances are he probably hurts you in other areas like maybe having a .208 avg. or something like that. Looking at you Juan Pierre. Saves however can be found everywhere.

Let’s say after May your team is down by 40 SB already. Jose Reyes has 20 SB to start the season. He’s a lock to get another 40 the rest of the way. Sounds like the perfect trade target for your team right? Now ask yourself if you think the GM holding Reyes would give him up. Probably not! But even if he was available, do you know what you would have to give up to get him? It’s just not happening. That’s how valuable stolen bases are. PUNT the saves and focus on shoring up everything else. Which leads us to:

4.  Do not spend high for closers
This one is short and self-explanatory if you’ve been reading the whole article. But delve into it deeper and this is why you don’t spend high for closers:

You have 30 MLB teams and that means 30 closer jobs. In a 12-person league that means 2.5 closers for everyone. There are probably 10 teams with closer by committees, so for arguments sake, there’s 20 rock solid closers. That’s still close to 2 per team. But closers lose jobs like bankers on Wall Street. Every week there’s a guy on your wire picking up saves. Pitchers go down more frequently than hitters. Imagine spending a 5th round pick on Mariano Rivera only to watch him hit the DL (he is almost 40 years old). Then you see a savvy GM pick up his replacement and gobble up all those saves you expected Rivera to get. Obviously injury hurts everyone. But a hitter plays in 150 games a year if he’s healthy. He hits the DL and misses 15 games and you still have 135 games with him. He still has a chance for some multiple home run games to make up for what he lost. Same with RBIs, but you can’t have multiple save games. Two weeks for a closer is 5-6 saves lost. Yet you drafted Rivera primarily for the 40 saves you expect out of him. That’s 15% of his total gone. Spending a 5th through 9th rounder on a closer is the second biggest mistake you can make. Not to mention all of the laughter you hear from GM’s once you do it.

5.  Always draft the all around player

This one is tricky, but benefits you in the long run. Remember it’s a marathon not a race. It happens all the time during the draft. You’re midway through and you’re looking at your team. You realize “man I need more HRs”. So against better judgment, you go ahead and select Adam Dunn two rounds earlier than he should be going rather than Vernon Wells. You’ve fallen in love with the 40 dingers because you feel you “need it” after looking at your team. In theory it should work but in actuality you’re making your team worse. Here’s the line on both for 2008:

Wells – .300avg, 20Hrs, 78RBIs, 63Runs, 4SB

Dunn – .236, 40Hrs, 100RBIs, 79Runs, 2SB

Wells missed 54 games last season. Project his numbers over a full season and you have:

.283, 25Hrs, 100RBIs, 88Runs, 8 SB

Anyway you look at it, Dunn will get you about 10 more hrs, probably 20 more RBIs with nearly identical runs missed games or not. Yet his avg. absolutely kills you. It’s like working out your arms and neglecting your stomach. You’d have big pythons with a beer gut. For me, I’ll take the well-rounded body thank you very much. It’s the same thing for SB. You pass on Matt Holiday for Ichiro Suzuki. Even though that makes more sense because Suzuki really helps you in average and runs along with the stolen bags. He’s still a three-category player while Holliday is a four-category player.

Now you are ready to swim in the pool. You still need to have a good draft. You can’t use this strategy and then go out there and draft Carlos Lee with the 3rd overall pick and expect things to work out for you. You also have to work your waiver wire and make some trades along the way. Everyone has bad years and some players may be drafted in the first round but actually perform more like a 4th rounder. But if you follow these golden principles you should have a very good team ready to compete.


Written by Eric Stashin the Rotoprofessor

It’s an interesting question as what you should do with your final round draft choice.  Do you take a rookie to stash away?  Do you take a player being pegged as a breakout candidate?  Do you take an injury risk sleeper?  Do you take a player who has completely fallen out of grace?

Obviously, this is only a relevant discussion if you are in a league where you draft reserves (which should be most leagues).  Otherwise, if you are drafting only players to use in your starting line-up, you obviously aren’t taking someone to stash away.  Instead, you are going to look for the player who best fits the position that is vacant.

Here is the last round of one of my drafts from prior to the 2008 season (3 OF’ers, no CI or MI):

  1. Homer Bailey
  2. Kevin Kouzmanoff
  3. Mark Teahen
  4. Kazuo Matsui
  5. Chris Duncan
  6. Troy Glaus
  7. Greg Maddux
  8. Stephen Drew
  9. Mark Buehrle
  10. Billy Butler
  11. Jair Jurrjens
  12. Melky Cabrera

The whole scope of possibilities was covered here as well as everything in between.  You had young players/rookies looked upon as good players to stash away (Bailey, Jurrjens).  You had breakout candidates (Kouzmanoff, Drew).  You had injury risk players (Glaus).  You had older stars who have fallen out of favor (Maddux).

The question is, which direction should you go?  Personally, I tend to lean towards the breakout potential player, unless I’m completely sold on a youngster that could be worth stashing or a veteran who is sitting there is just too good to pass up.  My pick in this draft was Kouzmanoff (boy, would I have rather been able to say it was Drew), and despite it not necessarily panning out perfectly, it is a pick I’d be willing to make again because it was my last pick and I was gambling on upside potential.  If the pick failed (and it pretty much did), what did it hurt?  The fact that I won the league tells you that it didn’t…at all.  If it had panned out, Kouzmanoff could have been my starting 3B.

This season, in the two expert mock drafts I’ve completed (though they don’t have benches) I’ve taken Aaron Hill and Mike Cameron.  Hill fits the mold of Kouzmanoff, while Cameron was a need pick more then anything.  Generally, I’d rather try to strike gold (like the person did with Drew in ‘08) as opposed to a veteran where you know what you’re going to get.  Hill is a player that I feel could produce as a starting 2B, so he’s a player that I’ll be targeting (and there will be an upcoming article discussing him as a sleeper coming soon).  He seems like a perfect end game play for upside potential.

What do you try to target in your drafts final round?

For more great fantasy info, check out Rotoprofessor.com.


Written by Eric Stashin the Rotoprofessor

Drafting high-level rookie prospects is one of the toughest decisions to make because there generally is so much uncertainty surrounding them.  Unless you are drafting deep into Spring Training, you never know for sure if they will break camp with the big league club, and if they don’t how long it will be until they arrive.  You also have the uncertainty of exactly how they will produce (will they be Ryan Braun or Alex Gordon?).

Last year the big two players people debated over were Evan Longoria and Jay Bruce.  I was involved in a draft where Longoria was taken in the sixteenth round (out of twenty-one rounds), while Bruce went undrafted.  Obviously, we all know that Longoria paid huge dividends to this owner (well, he would have if he had not grown inpatient and dropped him in mid-May, though his lose was my gain).

Obviously, gambling on rookies doesn’t work for all formats.  If you are in a league that has a very small bench (3 or less), you really don’t have the room to stash a player away, hoping that he gets recalled and makes an impact.  That makes this a non-issue and they should be left for the waiver wire unless you are 100% positive that they will break camp with the team.

Keeper leagues, on the other hand, it’s a no-brainer to take the risk.  When you have the option to get a player who could help you for not only this season, but future years as well, you have to roll the dice, especially in the later rounds.

It’s those yearly leagues where you have plenty of bench space available to you where you have to determine if it is worth taking the gamble and when.  Honestly, it’s a very low risk proposition, especially at the tail end of your draft once you have your starting line-up set in stone.  Taking a player like that to potentially hold onto makes tremendous sense to me.  He has the potential to perform as a starter and give your team a tremendous boost in the later rounds.

Once you decide to draft a rookie, the next question is how do you decide who?  First of all, I’d be much more apt to gamble on a hitter over a pitcher, despite the fact pitchers are more likely to arrive in the majors.  A rookie pitcher has proven to be inconsistent, they could dominate one game and get shelled the next.  That’s not to say that rookie pitchers are unusable, but I’d rather grab them off the waiver wire as opposed to using a draft choice.

That leaves great young hitters as the object of our affections here.  I would’ve supported owners drafting Longoria and Bruce last season from the sixteenth round and later.  I would’ve recommended the same thing with Ryan Braun prior to 2007 (in fact, I had grabbed him in the reserve round of my auction draft).

For me, taking a gamble from the sixteenth round and later on a potentially impact young bat is an easy call, if the right player presents himself.  For the past two years, there have been options available to us.  There could be this year as well, though time will tell.  Someone like Matt Wieters has been all the rage in expert mock drafts, though in my opinion people are going a little too crazy in reaching to draft him.  Matt LaPorta is another name to keep an eye on, though he’s more likely to go undrafted due to the position he plays.

So, how do you go about drafting rookies?  Do you avoid them?  Do you target them in the mid-to-late rounds?

For more great fantasy info, check out Rotoprofessor.com.


Part of the USA Today Sports Media Group